Documents (PDF) - May 2021
|
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO MCR 2.116(C)(4) and (8)
For the reasons stated herein and in the accompanying brief in opposition, Plaintiff, WILLIAM BAILEY ("Plaintiff'), by and through his attorneys, DePERNO LAW OFFICE, PLLC, respectfully request this Court deny the joint motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)( 4) and (8) for the reasons set forth herein and in the accompanying brief. (VIEW DOCUMENTS BELOW) |
|
Documents Posted May 17, 2021
| [1]_supplement_to_motion_to_amend_051620_1_.pdf |
| [2]_ex_a_-_first_amended_complaint.pdf |
| ex_1-4.pdf |
| ex_5-7.pdf |
| ex_8-9.pdf |
| ex_10.pdf |
| ex_11.pdf |
| ex_12-13.pdf |
| ex_14-16.pdf |
| ex_17-26.pdf |
| ex_27-29.pdf |
| ex_30-32.pdf |
Documents Posted May 10, 2021
| supplemental_brief_051021_1_.pdf |
| ex_1_-_lenberg_report.pdf |
Documents Posted May 7, 2021
| [1]_response_to_motions_for_protective_order_050721.pdf |
| [2]_ex_1_subpoenas.pdf |
| [3]_ex_2_lenberg_2.pdf |
| [4]_ex_3_antrim_precincts.pdf |
Documents Posted May 3, 2021
| [1]_response_to_motion_for_summary_disp.pdf |
| [2]_brief_response_to_motion_for_summary_disp.pdf |
| [3]_ex_1_sheryl_guy_testimony.pdf |
| [4]_ex_2_press_release__nov_23_2020_.pdf |
| [5]_ex_3_press_release__dec_9_2020_.pdf |
| [6]_ex_4_press_release__dec_14_2020_.pdf |
| [7]_ex_5_press_release__dec_18_2020_.pdf |
| [8]_ex_6_press_release__mar_2_2021_.pdf |
| [9]_ex_7_antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf |
| [10]_ex_8_dismissals.pdf |
| [11]_ex_9_errata_orders.pdf |
| [12]_ex_10_penrose_1.pdf |
| [13]_ex_11_cotton_1.pdf |
| [14]_ex_12_cyber_ninjas_1.pdf |
| [15]_ex_13_penrose_2.pdf |
| [16]_ex_14_lenberg_2.pdf |
| [17]_ex_15_audit_notice.pdf |
| [18]_ex_16_email.pdf |
| [19]_ex_17_hand_recount__dec_17_2020_.pdf |
| [20]_ex_18_post_election_audit_manual.pdf |
| [21]_ex_19_ryan.pdf |
| [22]_motion_for_leave_to_amend_the_complaint.pdf |
| [23]_ex_1_proposed_amended_complaint.pdf |
| download all documents above.zip |
